Thursday, May 31, 2012

3 Star Officiating Camp

Is your league or association moving to 3-man officiating? Are you wanting to increase your skills to get more games or better games by learning more about 3-man vs 2-man officiating? Attend the 3 Star Officiating Camp sponsored by Ump-Attire.com.

The camp runs June 17-21st at Thomas More University in Fort Wright, Kentucky. It will be staffed by Division I and veteran high school officials including Tom Eades and Rod Creech.

Located at Thomas More University in Fort Wright Kentucky, space is limited to 65 participants. At the time of writing, 10 openings remain for this popular camp.

For more information, visit www.3starofficiating.com

Friday, May 25, 2012

How Not to Flip When Players Flop: Recommendations from Officials

I recently asked the question about how one should handle overreacting by a player to draw a foul. In other words, a flop.

There were some great suggestions from officials when the question was posed on the Ump-Attire.com fan page.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Give the Floppers Academy Awards


Watching my fair share of basketball this year, I've noticed flopping is on the rise. You know, guys who exaggerate a foul or outright fake one in order to get the official to blow the whistle in their favor with excessive diving, flailing and/or screaming. That description reminds me of my kids when they were in their terrible twos.

There's been a lot of talk about flopping during the recent NBA playoffs. Even Commissioner David Stern thinks there is too much.
"I think it's time to look at (flopping) in a more serious way because it's only designed to fool the referee. It's not a legitimate play in my judgment. I recognize if there's contact (you) move a little bit, but some of this is acting. We should give out Oscars rather than MVP trophies." 
When I played high school, I was taught how to take a charge. I was good at it. I took 3 in one game. However, I didn't ever fake a foul. That sounds like cheating to me, and I never saw any glory in winning by cheating. The only flops I took were on the couch at home after the game was over.

Players seem to be taking the traditional response to an offensive foul or charge call and extending it to other situations. At times, this appears more like individuals attempting to get their Screen Actors Guild rather than playing basketball.

My suggested remedy? Call a technical in similar fashion as they do in soccer? Maybe, if it's blatant enough or if the acting is really, really bad.

Or maybe not. Basketball officials have a lot to watch for already in a very fast paced game. My suggestion is fairly simple. Call nothing at all if there is an obvious flop. What results is a 5-on-4 power play. That's penalty enough, especially if the flopper is playing defense.

Sure the referee might get yelled out at the time, especially when the acting is good and the fans are duped, but after, if it makes Sportscenter or You Tube, the official will be exonerated and maybe the flopper humiliated. Remember when Lebron James faked being poked in the eye and slow motion video replay revealed it? (And he wonders why everyone hates him.)

In  James's case and others known for their fakery, remember the story "The Boy Who Cried Wolf"? The one where the boy cried wolf a few times when there wasn't one to gain attention only to get no attention the third time when there actually was a wolf? Note to players who gain a reputation for crying foul too often: Don't be upset when the actual foul comes and it doesn't get called.

What do you think? How do you handle it when someone isn't fouled but attempts to make it so through acting?

For more on flops, read:

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

NBA Players and Coaches Remember Official Fondly

Everybody hates officials, right? Wrong.

Ken Hudson, one of two of the first african-american officials in the NBA in 1968, died recently at the age of 71.

Coaches and players remembered Hudson fondly:
"He was a neat man, stood for a lot of good things, and I think he’s responsible for a lot of inner city kids being where they are — especially pro basketball and just sports in general." - Doc Rivers
"He was a very fascinating guy if you got a chance to sit down and get to know him. He knew the history of the game. - Cedric Maxwell 
“...Kenny was a great friend...just a great guy." - Dominique Wilkins
Read the full comments in this Boston Herald article.

Hudson wrote a book on his officiating called A Tree Stump in the Valley of Redwoods. View an excellent interview with Hudson on CNN from 2009 here.


Thursday, March 22, 2012

Calling Games the Same at the End of the Game

A lane violation was called against UNC-Asheville at the end of its second round NCAA loss against Syracuse. Coach Eddie Biedenbach said that it was the correct call but "not in the last minute of a close NCAA tournament game."

Is he correct? Should officials call the game differently at the end when the game is on the line than at other parts of the game?

The Bleacher Report Rules Columnist Gil Amber states in the article "NCAA Lane Violation: Referees Must Always Be Fair, Analysts Must Know the Rules"
The idea of calling a game differently during its final minutes compared to its opening ones is a philosophical question that good officials in all sports dismiss as a misguided myth that balks at the officiating axiom of consistency...

The rules book contains no section titled, "Modified rules for the final two minutes" or "How to officiate the final 2.8 seconds of a potential upset."
What do you think? Is a lane violation a lane violation except for the last 2 minutes of a close game? Are there other rules that are non-important or trivial, such as an over-the-back call on a final shot, that should be ignored late in a hotly contested match-up?

Posted by Jim Kirk, CEO/President of Ump-Attire.com and avid fan of sports and sports officials everywhere. Find Jim on Facebook, Twitter and Linkedin.

Sunday, March 18, 2012

Fans at Games Should Have Video Replay Access

There's nothing like the experience of watching a game in person. Well, except for the lack of access to instant video replay (and longer lines to the bathroom).

A play happens quickly. A charge, a close play at the plate, a flag that came from nowhere.

Boy, I'd love to see that play again! Give it to me in all angles, in super slow motion! I want to see!!! Did the official get it right? Often, it certainly doesn't appear so as it unfolded in full speed.

But in most cases, the officials do get it right. At home, where you can yell and scream all you want without interfering with the game or the enjoyment of all the attendees sitting within earshot, you get to see it.

At games, live and in person, you don't. Oh sure they might replay a dunk, a home run or a TD pass. But a close call? They refrain.

Should they show it?

What are the powers-that-be afraid of?

While at the NCAA basketball tourney second round (the old first round) I attended in Louisville, the large screens during the first two games showed every close call; every charge, every block, every foot on the line.

My mouth was agape! I was surprised! Was there a video guy in the booth who had gone rogue? Was this an experiment by the NCAA?

So how did the instant video replay of close calls play with spectators? For those games, it was great. The games were well officiated and the overwhelming majority of calls that at first glance could have gone the other way appeared actually correct.

Here's how it played out:
  1. A close call happened - for example, a player control foul (charge) was called that looked like the defender's feet were not set.
  2. Fans of the call not in their favor would react negatively with jeers and boos.
  3. The video screens would show the instant replay in slow motion right after the play.
  4. The replay showed the defender was set, and the call appeared correct.
  5. The self-generated wind from fans was let out of their sails as quickly as it went in.
What is most interesting is over the course of each game, something remarkable happened. Fans tended to respond less to the officiating. Had they started to gain confidence in the officials after seeing so often their initial impression was wrong and the officials were correct? It certainly seemed that way.

Officials (umpires, too) at levels where video replay would be available typically do a fantastic job. Let's start showing instant replay at games and let everyone who doesn't think so see for themselves.

What do you think? Have you seen close calls replayed at sporting events you've attended? How did it go? What are disadvantages and other advantages to showing instant replay at live games of close calls?

Related Posts
Posted by Jim Kirk, CEO/President of Ump-Attire.com and avid fan of sports and sports officials everywhere. Find Jim on Facebook, Twitter and Linkedin.

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

NBA Referees Say and Do the Darndest Things

Take a look at this video that reveals the some of the personality of NBA referees and how they interact with coaches and players.